OPEN BORDERS: United Nations Negotiating ‘Global Migration’ Plan

The globalists want to eliminate the sovereignty of nations and eliminate borders.

Without borders, a nation doesn’t exist.

That’s why the globalists want borders eliminated.

They are seeking to further centralize control, and to do that they need to eliminate nationalism.

If they can eliminate borders, they can eliminate any real sense of there being distinct nations. And if they can do that, they can eliminate nationalism.

So, it’s no surprise that they are now pushing for a “global compact for migration that would encourage governments to offer more legal venues for migrants,” as noted by Yahoo News.

Here are a few things said by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, showing his intention to eliminate national sovereignty:

“Authorities that erect major obstacles to migration – or place severe restrictions on migrants’ work opportunities – inflict needless economic self-harm.” 

“They impose barriers to having their labor needs met in an orderly, legal fashion.”

“Worse still, they unintentionally encourage illegal migration.”

“The majority of migrants move across borders legally, but Guterres warned in his report that climate change and demographic trends will lead to a further spike in migration in the future.”

“Describing migration as a “positive global phenomenon,” Guterres called for greater international cooperation to protect vulnerable migrants.”

So, the head of a global organization is telling countries that they shouldn’t even try to decide who they let in and who they don’t, because they will just enter illegally anyway.

And who do you think he wants to manage the “international corporation”? Certainly not individual nations. He would want the United Nations to be in charge of borders.

That’s a direct assault on national sovereignty, and with disloyal globalists like Trudeau in office, we can expect that our borders will get even weaker and less meaningless than they already are.

As I’ve said many times before, Canada is a welcoming nation and we should remain so. But that welcome must be controlled by our own nation, and must be on our own terms. We must never allow a globalist organization to take control of our borders away from us.

Spencer Fernando

*****
You can support SpencerFernando.com by becoming a monthly contributor through Patreon, or making a contribution through PayPal.

15
Share Your Thoughts

avatar
11 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
14 Comment authors
Daniel HarderPoliwatchClive EdwardsMiles LunnAlaba Carleton Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Dave Bainard
Guest
Dave Bainard

This almost seems like it could be a Trudeau idea. Throw the climate change scam into the mix and you have a disaster in the making. The UN boneheads need to look no further than Europe to see that borderless countries don’t work. That is of course if you don’t see it through Islamic eyes.

Ana Gomes
Guest
Ana Gomes

Trudeau has no ideas, he copies them from Marxism, Hitler, Castro, Soros and other masters of the new slavery , or New World Order/Disorder. All Friends -of -the- Family, you know… Without the Family, where would he be? Even the bouncer job would have been given to somebody else.lol Many of our so called intellectuals have been living on the hog, idea free, fed on Marxism alone and they have managed to sound and look like learned people,among the naive.. Shallowness and Performance is all you need to survive. Ideas not required. They are all there, in K. Marx books… Read more »

Alaba Carleton
Guest
Alaba Carleton

I agree with everything that you have said. It is good to know that there are others who see that when Trudeau says Post Modernism it is his way of trying to slide Marxism into Canada without people realizing that he has a socialist agenda, but he is marely a pawn being used by Seros and his ilk.

Maurice
Guest
Maurice

This is a good idea! By eliminating borders, and hence nations, it is self evident that the totally useless organization called the United Nations would no longer exist.

Poliwatch
Guest
Poliwatch

Holy Cow! I never thought of it that way. Although they wouldn’t allow an issue of mere semantics to stand in their way, how could they continue to call themselves….. United “Nations”. We need Trump like most people don’t realize. He not only has to fight the leftist idiots and fake media that plague him day to day but, unbeknown to the majority of the world, he also fights to keep America’s sovereignty and in so doing will fight back against any UN takeover. He has the power by cutting funding to the UN. People need to know that Hillary/Obama… Read more »

bruce
Guest
bruce

Spencer, I think you should throw your hat in the ring as a CPC candidate. Go head to head with a Liberal and just make all the points your editorials have espoused over the last year. Trudeau’s candidates have shallow arguments but tend to be clever and corrupt. They will buy votes and lie to constituents with extreme but false sincerity. Expose them for who they really are, well paid puppets for their Liberal masters and the globalist cabal.

Helena
Guest
Helena

Reminding liberals that we all have front doors with locks to keep others out out of our homes doesn’t seem to impact. The analogy to a nations’ borders is obvious and one has to wonder at the delusions of anyone who doesn’t make the “leap” to understand. With 7 billion people on the planet and “migration” only to lands settled by European stock- how will this play out? How can the preening social justice warrior types not see how this will unfold. Oh, I forgot, we are the dispensable pawns in the game played by the corrupt financial elite. They… Read more »

Poliwatch
Guest
Poliwatch

Holy Cow! I never thought of it that way. Although they wouldn’t allow an issue of mere semantics to stand in their way, how could they continue to call themselves….. United “Nations”. We need Trump like most people don’t realize. He not only has to fight the leftist idiots and fake media that plague him day to day but, unbeknown to the majority of the world, he also fights to keep America’s sovereignty and in so doing will fight back against any UN takeover. He has the power by cutting funding to the UN. People need to know that Hillary/Obama… Read more »

RnBram
Guest
RnBram

Typo? “and less meaningless than they already are.”

Tanya Gaw
Guest
Tanya Gaw

Better yet Spencer…you should run for Prime Minister in 2019…just let me know and we will start rallying support!

Colin Henderson
Guest
Colin Henderson

The common sense solution is for the US to stop funding the Islamic globalist UN

Gaurav
Guest
Gaurav

I agree with other commentators here, Spencer. I am ready to volunteer for your election campaigning and any other help you need, should you decide to contest elections. Trust me, your logical & well-researched arguments will stun the liberals.

Miles Lunn
Guest

Certainly we should control who comes in and doesn’t, but disagree open borders means one is not a nation. Using this definition, that would mean any country that is a member of the European Union is no longer a nation since the EU has abolished all internal border controls and allows free mobility of labour within the EU (although not for non-EU citizens). As such using this definition that means Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, Netherlands, Spain, Poland are no longer nations so I think one can still be a sovereign country without borders. And never mind even the UK with… Read more »

Clive Edwards
Guest
Clive Edwards

Borders have tended to be somewhat fluid throughout history. Armed conflicts move or eliminate borders. Treaties and trade deals may eliminate borders somewhat (one of the problems I have with NAFTA). Migration, if migrants are assimilated rather than encouraged to maintain their original culture over future generations can re-affirm borders and renew a fading nationalism. How long would it take if existing national borders were dissolved before, for example, Alberta would declare nationhood and establish border controls? I could be in favour of that…. And Catalonia, Scotland, Texas…there are many regions that are currently ruled by national governments that would… Read more »

Daniel Harder
Guest
Daniel Harder

Thia may be true of their intentions, but I am most certain that these borderless nations would still only be opened for those that fit into their agenda….. :/
It has been my experience that these open border policies do not exist for a Candian citizen wishing to bring his wife into his own country.
Not without financial and emotional hardship attached.