BREAKING: Jody Wilson-Raybould Not Commenting On Trudeau PMO SNC-Lavalin Bombshell Scandal Due To ‘Solicitor-Client Privilege’

“As the former minister of justice and attorney general of Canada, I am bound by solicitor-client privilege in this matter,” says Jody Wilson-Raybould.

Former Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould won’t be commenting on the growing scandal surrounding the Globe & Mail report that the Trudeau PMO pushed her to intervene in the prosecution of SNC-Lavalin.

“As the former minister of justice and attorney general of Canada, I am bound by solicitor-client privilege in this matter,” said Wilson-Raybould.

This is actually a very telling statement.

All Jody Wilson-Raybould has to do to make the scandal basically go away is to say that the Globe & Mail story was false – as Trudeau has said.

The fact that she won’t do so says quite a lot, and it raises serious doubts about Trudeau’s carefully crafted ‘denial,’ which notably denied something he and the PMO wasn’t accused of.

Wilson-Raybould is sending a clear message that she won’t be used by the Trudeau PMO, and won’t just say something politically expedient to make the scandal dissipate.

Trudeau has much to answer for, and this scandal isn’t going away. Canadians demand the truth.

Spencer Fernando

Photo – YouTube

***

Because Justin Trudeau is bailing out the establishment media with $600 million taxpayer dollars, independent Canadian voices like Spencer Fernando are more important than ever before. You can support Spencer Fernando with a monthly contribution through Patreon or by contributing through PayPal at the button below:




1
Share Your Thoughts

avatar
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Carol Tencza Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Carol Tencza
Guest
Carol Tencza

I don’t see where there is solicitor/client privilege in this issue. She is an elected official and because of that irregardless of her appointments and portfolio she is a public servant just like every other mp in the House. I would like to see how she is using client privilege to not speak to this issue. Do you we have to have an inquiry in order to get to the bottom of this?